Beijing sends ships to Yemen to evacuate Chinese nationals
Chinese military to study Russian snap check practices
Elections in east Ukraine must be coordinated with Donetsk, Luhansk heads — official
Co-pilot of crashed Germanwings Airbus treated for 'suicidal tendencies'
Almost 100 military units and organizations created in Crimea — defense minister
Elections in east Ukraine must be coordinated with Donetsk, Luhansk heads — officialWorld March 30, 21:48
Sanctions and crisis complicated performance of many license agreements — deputy PMWorld March 30, 21:38
Kremlin will not comment on gas discount for Ukraine — spokesmanEconomy March 30, 21:26
Russian government will examine opportunity of offering gas discount to Ukraine soonEconomy March 30, 21:19
Chinese military to study Russian snap check practicesRussia March 30, 20:51
OSCE observers find Kiev forces’ unaccounted for artillery in east Ukraine — reportWorld March 30, 20:21
Compromise on anti-Iran sanctions outlines at Lausanne talks — sourcesWorld March 30, 19:51
DPR, LPR setting up commission on reforming Ukraine’s constitution — joint statementWorld March 30, 19:41
Armenian parliament speaker says Armenia-Russia relations are at high levelWorld March 30, 19:26
UN, February 5 (Itar-Tass) —— Irritation close to hysteria was a response from some members of the UN Security Council to firm and principle position of Russia and China, which blocked the anti-Syria resolution.
On Saturday, Moscow and Beijing used their right of veto during voting at the Security Council of a draft resolution on Syria presented by Morocco. The document, which had been drafted by seven countries, was supported by 13 countries, while two voted against it.
Following the voting, France’s Ambassador to the UN Gerard Araud mentioned that Russia and China had been blocking for the second time over several months the resolution of Syria /on October 4 2011, Russia and China put a veto upon a draft of anti-Syria resolution/. Two permanent members of the Security Council are failing any actions of the Security Council, they are doing so realising fully the tragic consequences, he said.
The US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice said the Security Council was being "held hostage by a couple of members".
Quite similar were comments from the UK Ambassador to the UN Mark Lyall Grant, who said that the double veto from Russia and China could not be justified anyhow.
Claiming this criticism as groundless, Russia’s Ambassador to the UN Vitaly Churkin stressed that the decision of the Security Council “should be exactly such because some influential members of the international community, including those sitting at this table, from the very beginning of the crisis in Syria undermined the opportunity of political settlement calling for change of the regime and setting the opposition against the power without shunning provocations and forcing for armed means of fighting.”
Churkin regretted that “the work we have been doing at the Security Council has not been finalised.” He continued saying that the Russian delegation had to vote against the presented draft resolution, as it “reflected inadequately the reality in Syria.”
“Co-authors of the resolution have not taken our suggestions that Syria’s opposition should distance from extremist groups.”