Putin: Russia coming under pressure for not bargaining its sovereignty
Amsterdam court receives Ukraine’s statement on Scythian gold
Russia ready to export Iskander missile complexes to Saudi Arabia
Two Ukrainian traffic officers defect to side of DPR
Serbia has taken no decision on participation in Turkish Stream project
Saakashvili, Ukraine’s governor in Odessa, dismisses 20 senior officialsWorld July 04, 7:25
Finnish foreign minister does not believe in cooling of relations with RussiaWorld July 04, 3:33
BRICS, SCO, EEU leaders to discuss geopolitical, security problems in Russia’s Ufa July 9Russia July 03, 21:59
Moscow notes growing politicization and use of double standards at UN Human Rights CouncilRussia July 03, 21:54
Greek premier asks for 30% debt write-offWorld July 03, 21:47
Several dozen NGOs among contenders for 'patriotic stop list’ — Russian lawmakerRussia July 03, 21:22
About 4,000 extremists marching in central Kiev demanding revocation of Minsk agreementsWorld July 03, 20:55
Putin: Russia coming under pressure for not bargaining its sovereigntyRussia July 03, 20:36
Rosnano chief Chubais to testify in favour of ex-colleague Leonid MelamedRussia July 03, 20:28
UN, February 5 (Itar-Tass) —— Irritation close to hysteria was a response from some members of the UN Security Council to firm and principle position of Russia and China, which blocked the anti-Syria resolution.
On Saturday, Moscow and Beijing used their right of veto during voting at the Security Council of a draft resolution on Syria presented by Morocco. The document, which had been drafted by seven countries, was supported by 13 countries, while two voted against it.
Following the voting, France’s Ambassador to the UN Gerard Araud mentioned that Russia and China had been blocking for the second time over several months the resolution of Syria /on October 4 2011, Russia and China put a veto upon a draft of anti-Syria resolution/. Two permanent members of the Security Council are failing any actions of the Security Council, they are doing so realising fully the tragic consequences, he said.
The US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice said the Security Council was being "held hostage by a couple of members".
Quite similar were comments from the UK Ambassador to the UN Mark Lyall Grant, who said that the double veto from Russia and China could not be justified anyhow.
Claiming this criticism as groundless, Russia’s Ambassador to the UN Vitaly Churkin stressed that the decision of the Security Council “should be exactly such because some influential members of the international community, including those sitting at this table, from the very beginning of the crisis in Syria undermined the opportunity of political settlement calling for change of the regime and setting the opposition against the power without shunning provocations and forcing for armed means of fighting.”
Churkin regretted that “the work we have been doing at the Security Council has not been finalised.” He continued saying that the Russian delegation had to vote against the presented draft resolution, as it “reflected inadequately the reality in Syria.”
“Co-authors of the resolution have not taken our suggestions that Syria’s opposition should distance from extremist groups.”