Russian embassy in U.S. tightens security, no specific threatsRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 30, 3:44
Lavrov urges Steinmeier not to fuel tensions over Serbian Republic eventsRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 29, 21:26
Diplomat: Polish authorities intentionally worsen relations with RussiaRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 29, 21:18
Germany urges Russia to agree to ceasefire in Syria longer than 48 hoursWorld September 29, 20:40
Kerry: US standing on verge of calling off talks with Russia on SyriaWorld September 29, 20:00
Putin, Merkel call for joining efforts to establish truce in SyriaRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 29, 19:54
Putin, Merkel agree schedule of Normandy Four contacts on Donbass settlementRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 29, 19:31
Russia concerned over US' statements on readiness to use nuclear weaponsRussian Politics & Diplomacy September 29, 19:01
Russia to hold consultations with OPEC on oil production cap in October-NovemberWorld oil prices September 29, 19:00
SIMFEROPOL, March 31. /ITAR-TASS/. Crimea may join Russia’s integrated energy system, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said at a government meeting, which was held in Simferopol on Monday, March 31, and focused on the socioeconomic development of Crimea and Sevastopol.
“It is vitally important to ensure reliable and independent electricity supplies to the whole of Crimea and supply fuel to the power industry. One option is for Crimea to join the Russian integrated energy system across the Kerch Strait or to build its own generation capacities,” Medvedev said, adding that both options would be considered.
“In the event of any critical situation we can always provide alternative sources of power supply, primarily for socially important facilities,” he said, referring to mobile gas turbine power plants and other options.
Crimea needs to develop traditional energy production, not build a nuclear power plant, Pavel Ipatov, Deputy Director-General of the Rosenergoatom Company, told ITAR-TASS.
“There are no ready projects for building nuclear power plants there and it would be premature to speak about that now. I would even say pointless,” he said.
Ipatov recalled that in Soviet times there had been a project to build two 1,000 MW nuclear units in Crimea. The first unit was almost 90% finished and things went so far that even nuclear fuel was brought in so that the reactor could start operating at in the early 1990s. “However, now this site is in such condition that it cannot be restored. We have gone far ahead from the technologies that existed in the 1960s when the station was designed… and sometimes it is much more economically justified to build a new project than restore an old one,” Ipatov said.
“The approaches and solutions used in modern projects are more progressive in terms of security and cost efficiency. Therefore there should be a very serious argument in order to consider building a nuclear power plant in Crimea today,” he said.
In his opinion, Crimea should focus on developing alternative energy generation using the power of wind and sun. “This was done in Soviet times too, and one of the first solar power stations was operated in Crimea,” he said and observed at the same time that the cost of such generation would be dozens of times higher than that of traditional forms, which makes “their commercial construction unlikely”.
Ipatov believes that traditional power plants will most likely be built instead. “We will see by the end of this year what kind of decisions will be made to improve power supply in Crimea,” he added.