Russia’s losses from Crimea integration estimated at $150-200 bln — ex-finance minister
Russian army to have more than 350,000 contract servicemen by year end
Australia still in utter confusion over root causes of Ukrainian crisis — Russian diplomat
Co-pilot of crashed Germanwings Airbus treated for 'suicidal tendencies'
Kiev to toughen sanctions against Russian citizens — Poroshenko
Russia extends winter package of gas prices for UkraineEconomy April 01, 8:42
Both Russia's president, government focused on anti-crisis plan — Kremlin spokesmanRussia April 01, 8:36
Russia completes its Gonets orbital group — company presidentNon-political April 01, 8:29
Russia's Aeroflot plans to obtain 50 new Sukhoi SuperJets by 2016Russia April 01, 8:22
Iran, six world powers reach agreement ‘on all key aspects’World April 01, 3:52
Moldova’s president not to attend D-Day celebrations in Moscow on May 9World April 01, 0:44
Russian ministry of natural resources asks investigators to find snow leopard killerNon-political March 31, 21:57
Russia’s Muslims proclaim Islamic State as enemy of IslamWorld March 31, 21:40
Iran nuclear issue talks to continue far into night — French foreign ministerWorld March 31, 21:30
SIMFEROPOL, March 31. /ITAR-TASS/. Crimea may join Russia’s integrated energy system, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said at a government meeting, which was held in Simferopol on Monday, March 31, and focused on the socioeconomic development of Crimea and Sevastopol.
“It is vitally important to ensure reliable and independent electricity supplies to the whole of Crimea and supply fuel to the power industry. One option is for Crimea to join the Russian integrated energy system across the Kerch Strait or to build its own generation capacities,” Medvedev said, adding that both options would be considered.
“In the event of any critical situation we can always provide alternative sources of power supply, primarily for socially important facilities,” he said, referring to mobile gas turbine power plants and other options.
Crimea needs to develop traditional energy production, not build a nuclear power plant, Pavel Ipatov, Deputy Director-General of the Rosenergoatom Company, told ITAR-TASS.
“There are no ready projects for building nuclear power plants there and it would be premature to speak about that now. I would even say pointless,” he said.
Ipatov recalled that in Soviet times there had been a project to build two 1,000 MW nuclear units in Crimea. The first unit was almost 90% finished and things went so far that even nuclear fuel was brought in so that the reactor could start operating at in the early 1990s. “However, now this site is in such condition that it cannot be restored. We have gone far ahead from the technologies that existed in the 1960s when the station was designed… and sometimes it is much more economically justified to build a new project than restore an old one,” Ipatov said.
“The approaches and solutions used in modern projects are more progressive in terms of security and cost efficiency. Therefore there should be a very serious argument in order to consider building a nuclear power plant in Crimea today,” he said.
In his opinion, Crimea should focus on developing alternative energy generation using the power of wind and sun. “This was done in Soviet times too, and one of the first solar power stations was operated in Crimea,” he said and observed at the same time that the cost of such generation would be dozens of times higher than that of traditional forms, which makes “their commercial construction unlikely”.
Ipatov believes that traditional power plants will most likely be built instead. “We will see by the end of this year what kind of decisions will be made to improve power supply in Crimea,” he added.