Turkish PM announces presidential guard regiment disbandedWorld July 24, 1:07
FC Zenit St Petersburg beat FC CSKA Moscow 1-0 at 2016 Russian Super CupSport July 23, 22:55
1% chance for Russian athletes be allowed to Rio Olympics, says Russian sports ministerSport July 23, 17:28
Russian Olympic Committee sends to Games organizers full list of national teamSport July 23, 14:53
Deputy Premier: pilots, who downed Russian Su-24, involved in coup attempt in TurkeyWorld July 23, 14:13
Russian traveler sets speed record in round-the-globe solo balloon voyageSociety & Culture July 23, 14:06
Around-the-globe records: world's famous adventurersSociety & Culture July 23, 12:36
Russian truck crew wins Silk Road rallySport July 23, 8:20
Hillary Clinton announces Virginia senator Tim Kaine as candidate for US Vice PresidentWorld July 23, 4:34
Speaking of the approaching 20th anniversary of Russian troops’ withdrawal from Europe, Lavrov said at that time the government sincerely wanted a new life where Europe and the West as a whole would see Russia as a partner.
“If there is no more Warsaw Pact and Soviet Union, and the troops have already left, why maintain NATO and all that attributes of the Cold War era,” he said. But “the hopes remained unfulfilled”.
“As you know, NATO has not ceased to expand. It looks for the meaning to exist. Afghanistan helped for some time,” Lavrov said. “Now everybody understands that Afghanistan only weighs on NATO solidarity, as what NATO had no chance to success, and the problem of drug threat and drug production have deteriorated a lot.”
In this context, it was Russia that could give the organization new meaning of life, Lavrov said.
Then came Snowden and the Olympics where it was totally unclear what the West was dissatisfied about - the high price of the Games or Russia’s victory, the Minister said.
Lavrov lamented the fact that “with all the good intents expressed by Western partners in Europe” the Cold War “inertia and inability to resist the ongoing attempts to drive all Europeans under the NATO roof and make them talk to Russia in a harsh voice” persisted. This “short-sighted policy” was based on the wish to impose their own will at any cost, adopt sanctions against dissenters and retaliate for “independence and unwillingness to obey the unilateral, unipolar world”.