Donetsk republic hands over 23 bodies of Ukrainian troops killed near Illovaisk
Moscow cautions over any strike on Assad troops
Russian diplomat slams Victoria Nuland's statement on Nemtsov murder
Assets of two Russian banks frozen in US — media
Moscow dismisses NATO allegations that Russia conducts large-scale nuclear drills
EU top diplomats to discuss Ukrainian crisis, preparations for Eastern Partnership summitWorld March 06, 8:49
Russian envoy: NATO has long history of hybrid operationsWorld March 06, 8:33
Assets of two Russian banks frozen in US — mediaWorld March 06, 8:15
Russia’s emergencies ministry sending its representatives to DonetskRussia March 06, 0:30
Russian diplomat says current UN Human Rights Council session is over-politicizedWorld March 05, 22:01
Donetsk republic hands over 23 bodies of Ukrainian troops killed near IllovaiskWorld March 05, 21:49
Total of 33 miners killed by methane explosion in Donetsk coalmine — DPRWorld March 05, 21:29
Nine candidates apply for registration as Kazakhstan presidential candidatesWorld March 05, 21:12
Ukraine military pull back convoys of heavy weapons, restrict monitors’ advance — OSCEWorld March 05, 20:55
MOSCOW, June 9 (Itar-Tass) — The Russian State Duma lower parliament house has passed in the first reading a bill that creates a legislative base for a public television the government plans to establish. The bill is to be passed into law before the end of the spring parliamentary session.
The presidential decree orders to endorse the Charter of Public Television that would provide for a special administration structure, the Kommersant writes. The supervisory board will be the supreme body of the would-be channel, the Public Television council will form the supervisory board and exercise public control, and the director general and concurrently the editor-in-chief will be the channel’s top executive. The council members and the top executive will be appointed by the president. The government was also instructed to ensure fundraising for the Public Television.
Lawmakers, the newspaper notes, were worried about independence of the would-be channel. Thus, Nikolai Kolomeitsev of the Communist party asked whether the government had taken into account its mistakes made while creating the Russian Public Television, or ORT, channel, which “has turned to be public television of a small group of influential wealthy people.” A similar question was voiced by Mikhail Serdyuk of the A Just Russia party. Deputy Minister of Communications Alexander Maslov, who presented the bill at the lower parliament house, sounded resolute. There will be no “influence of anybody’s commercial interests” on the Public Television, he pledged. It means, in his words, that despite the fact that the channel would be funded by both the state and private investors, “the mechanism of target capital excludes any influence of those who invests money, the money will be depersonalized.”
The bill is expected to be passed into law in July. So far, until June 15, the Russian Public Chamber receives applications of those seeking membership in the Public Television council. Political parties seem to show little interest in it.
The State Duma has passed in the first reading government amendments to the law on non-commercial organizations to facilitate the launch of the Public Television by January 1, 2013, the Rossisskaya Gazeta daily writes. The opposition expressed its readiness to offer assistance in the formation of the new television channel. “It is pointless to criticize the Public Television before it is formed,” said chairman of the State Duma committee for public associations and religious organizations Yaroslav Nilov. “First, we shall see how the Public Television works and then decide what should be amended.”
However, Ilya Ponomaryov of A Just Russia could not help criticizing the would-be television channel. In his words, the Public Television, as it is defined in the bill, is unlikely to reflect the interests of entire society. To make it really efficient, the Public Television needs an independent personnel policy, an independent editorial policy, and independent financing, which is not provided in the bill, he said. His point of view however was not shared by the majority of lawmakers.